Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 1 won't be in 3-D a

[Silversurfer]

Imagine that — a studio realizes that a movie will look poopy in 3-D, so they decide not to do it. Warner Bros. decided the first half of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be 2-D only.

Said Warners in a statement:

Warner Bros Pictures has made the decision to release "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1" in 2D, in both conventional and IMAX theaters, as we will not have a completed 3D version of the film within our release date window. Despite everyone's best efforts, we were unable to convert the film in its entirety and meet the highest standards of quality. We do not want to disappoint fans who have long-anticipated the conclusion of this extraordinary journey, and to that end, we are releasing our film day-and-date on November 19, 2010 as planned. We, in alignment with our filmmakers, believe this is the best course to take in order to ensure that our audiences enjoy the consummate "Harry Potter" experience.

We knew Harry Potter had amazing powers, but the ability to vanquish the trend towards last-minute, eye-bleeding 3-D conversions? That's incredible.

http://io9.com/5659407/harry-potter-and ... Gizmodo%29" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Silversurfer]

excellent, I wonder if they finish shooting part two in 2-D?

[Likay]

It's actually somewhat good news that someone have a sense of quality regarding 3d. If not done properly then don't.
Some the comments almost leaves me without hope for education in the world....

[cybereality]

Yes, if you are going to do a crappy job might as well just leave it in 2D.

[crim3]

there are tastes for all kinds