RealD Ce4 = Sony shutter? IR?
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:40 pm
Read the bit cauldron marketing paper again, and they feature "maximum brightness".
Thats bad news on image quality front: contrast willl be very bad, I for one definately want only 32% transmittance but 5000 contrast ratio. Thats why I use shutters in the first place, I dont want the screen's extinction property to interfere with the contrast. Shutter is brutal on the brightness front but can be compensated for .
So , there were these rumours about CE4 being sony shutter , indeed its remarkable, IR , emitter, all 'stimmt'.
Price went down in the process too
I think its time to upgrade the nV glasses. I would even settle for wires if thats needed to make a cheap CE4 work .
Oh one another thing, I think the outer polarizer layer is missing on these glasses, so one should buy the polarizer foil seperately to put in front of pj.
Thats bad news on image quality front: contrast willl be very bad, I for one definately want only 32% transmittance but 5000 contrast ratio. Thats why I use shutters in the first place, I dont want the screen's extinction property to interfere with the contrast. Shutter is brutal on the brightness front but can be compensated for .
So , there were these rumours about CE4 being sony shutter , indeed its remarkable, IR , emitter, all 'stimmt'.
Price went down in the process too
I think its time to upgrade the nV glasses. I would even settle for wires if thats needed to make a cheap CE4 work .
Oh one another thing, I think the outer polarizer layer is missing on these glasses, so one should buy the polarizer foil seperately to put in front of pj.